or: How to disguise bioweapons as medicinal necessities
Vaccines are biological products created by the pharmaceutical industry for the purpose of improving the health of children... or so we have somehow been led to believe. As researcher Mike Adams explains:
Just as big banks are "too big to fail," the vaccine industry is now "too big to investigate" and has been given carte blanche to violate all laws, medical ethics and honest business practices.
This is why the industry now gets away with repeated medical malpractice, violations of manufacturing safety and quality, medical experimentation on human victims, fraudulent advertising, systematic scientific fraud and other crimes that would land anybody else under federal indictment.
Is there no limit to the number of vaccines the drug industry will try to force onto children? With 271 vaccines now under development -- and the CDC's incessant pushing of endless vaccines for children -- there seems to be no limit to the greed and criminality of the vaccine industry. To these drug companies, human babies are nothing more than vaccine receptacles that earn them money while they enjoy 100% legal immunity from faulty products and deadly side effects.
One who chooses to believe what perceived authority figures say (i.e. the information coming from the control system) will not even be aware of the obvious strong correlation between number of vaccinations and autism rates. The only reason many regular people have a pro-vaccination "position" is that they do no research and cannot conceive of the idea that vaccination could be a harmful practice, due to the way the idea is presented via the media and its "authoritative sources". Letting go of the "position" often becomes even more difficult if one's own children have been vaccinated. The cognitive dissonance in this case is extremely strong.
As Mike Adams summarizes it:
To believe that vaccines are safe and carry no risks, a person has to believe that mercury, aluminum, MSG, squalene, formaldehyde and partially-viable viruses present zero health risks to a child when injected. This idea is wholly absurd, irrational and grossly unscientific, and it proves that the real science "quacks" in this debate are those who blindly push vaccines without any cognitive consideration of their very real health risks.
The CDC even publishes photos of children affected by vaccines — or, more accurately, by "medical mutilators of innocent children", as Mike Adams put it.
Actual effects of vaccines
Summing up how vaccines work, once again Mike Adams puts it best:
Vaccine "science" is a massive con job
The other huge con job found in vaccines is described thusly: Vaccines only "work" on those who don't need them. In other words, when vaccines do work, they do so by initiating an immune response to a weakened virus that's introduced into the body. This response requires an active and complex immune system that's functioning well... the same kind of immune system, in other words, that could ward off an infection of a live virus encountered in the wild.
Meanwhile, people who have suppressed immune systems and are therefore extremely vulnerable to infections in the wild also happen to have extremely poor (and sometimes completely nullified) responses to vaccines. They don't build antibodies, in other words, so the vaccines don't work for them (they are non-efficacious).
In order to make vaccines "work" better on those with weakened immune systems, vaccine manufacturers add adjuvant chemicals that are irritants which cause excessive inflammation in the hope of eliciting a stronger immune response. While this may help some people, it also carries a very real risk of causing inflammatory damage to the neurology of some children who receive these vaccines. The results, as borne out by the vaccine adverse events databases and Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, is a growing number of children who are maimed, neurological damaged, put into comas or even killed by vaccines.
The entire "skeptics" cult of modern medicine denies any of this is happening, and that's one reason why the skeptics are increasingly seen as high-functioning idiots who are possibly vaccine damaged themselves.
In the conclusion of an article entitled Studies Prove Without Doubt That Unvaccinated Children Are Far Healthier Than Their Vaccinated Peers, Christina England sums up what the actual comparative scientific studies show:
I find it amazing that despite mainstream media and leading government agencies stressing repeatedly that studies comparing vaccinated children to unvaccinated children cannot take place for ethical reasons, groups around the world are taking it upon themselves to do these studies anyway.
While surveys of this kind are often dismissed as being purely epidemiological and passed off as little more than stamp collecting, I believe that studies of this nature should not be dismissed out of hand. After all, many stamp collections contain just one stamp that is worth far more than its weight in gold.
These studies show without doubt that unvaccinated children are healthier than their vaccinated peers and, for this reason, these studies should be given careful consideration by all parents and professionals studying vaccination safety.
Beyond the benevolent intentions of the "authority" believers who perform the actual injections, could the real motives behind the vaccination campaigns for, for instance, African children, possibly be benevolent? The observation that bony children are still starving, but vaccines have arrived so that they can survive a little longer and die more slowly and painfully by starvation, has led many to speculate that these bony children may be part of black budget (or dark budget) bioweapons experiments and are thus being injected with what is more akin to a bioweapon than a life-saving immunity-activating mini-dose of a deadly virus.
Fever as a life-saving mechanism
The insanity of maintaining the initial premise (or lie) that there is negligible risk to vaccinations leads to doctors recommending the use of antipyretics — often paracetamol/acetaminophen, commonly known in the U.S. by its brand name Tylenol — to prevent the body from going into a state of fever in a desperate attempt to protect itself:
If your child has a vaccination, and you have a fever, my recommendation is don't give your child tylenol. Tylenol is suppressing your fever, your fever is there to protect the body from the oxidative stress which is being caused by the vaccination. Your fever is your body's natural healing response, and when you take Tylenol, it shuts down your liver's ability to make glutathione, which is what's gonna protect you from the neurotoxins that are in vaccinations.
In other words, in the case of paracetamol (Tylenol), not only is the fever suppressed, but the body's primary antioxidant, glutathione, is depleted or reduced. This is because one of paracetamol's three metabolites, NAPQI, is highly hepatotoxic, and the body uses glutathione to render it inert. This is also why paracetamol toxicity, which happens once the body's glutathione has been depleted (and is only noticed days later), is the most common cause of acute liver failure in the US and UK, and one of the most common causes of poisoning worldwide.
So strong is the "authoritative" brainwashing broadcast via the media that, as with other highly promoted false ideas like the anthropogenic global warming hoax, many media consumers have (mindlessly) crossed the threshold into irrational ultra-authoritarian fanaticism:
Fanaticism, as defined by Merriam-Webster, is a “fanatic outlook or behavior especially as exhibited by excessive enthusiasm, unreasoning zeal, or wild and extravagant notions on some subject.” Vaccine fanaticism is no different. It is characterized by an unwavering devotion to vaccines without any thought to the very real risks and dangers caused by vaccines. Vaccine fanatics deny that any risks exist and declare that those who even question the efficacy and safety of vaccines are the dangerous ones to society.
Many vaccine fanatics believe that those who question or oppose vaccines should be punished, even to the extent of rounding them up and jailing them. Their solution is to forcefully vaccinate children against the wishes of the parents, all in the name of the ‘greater good of society’. Despite what the American Medical Association has said in its own ethical code about mandatory vaccines, vaccine fanatics believe that forcing vaccines on others is the only solution. The AMA is very clear about patients having the right to determine their own course of treatments. Their ethical code clearly states “Informed consent is a basic policy in both ethics and law that physicians must honor.” Despite the fact that the AMA is against forcing vaccines and treatments upon patients, vaccine fanatics believe that no one has the right to make that decision for themselves and for their child; they believe that everyone should be vaccinated, by force if necessary.
In their efforts to force their beliefs on those around them, vaccine fanatics will go to great lengths to try to convince others, and to demonize anyone who doesn’t share their point of view. This kind of zealous ideal used to be reserved for matters of religion. Religious fanatics also tended to demonize others, these were the people who ardently believed that their religion is the only “true religion” and everyone else is going to hell. Vaccine fanatics believe that they are the only scientifically minded ones, and everyone else is scientifically illiterate. In reality, it is more scientifically illiterate to blatantly ignore the dangers involved in vaccinations. [...]
Even the manufacturers of vaccines freely admit that there are risks involved. The claim by vaccine manufacturers is that the benefits of vaccinating outweigh the risks — which is really not dissimilar to the idea that the obvious benefits of getting a shot of methamphetamine outweighs the obvious risks.
Researcher Sharyl Attkisson sums up how the the mainstream media has quite literally become GMO and vaccine propaganda machines, and lists some of the top pseudoskeptical amplifiers and actual researchers on both sides:
A new study this week found no link between vaccines and autism. It instantly made headlines on TV news and popular media everywhere. Many billed it as the final word, “once again,” disproving the notion that vaccines could have anything to do with autism.
When the popular press, bloggers and medical pundits uncritically promote a study like The Lewin Group’s, it must confound researchers like Lucija Tomljenovic, Catherine DeSoto, Robert Hitlan, Christopher Shaw, Helen Ratajczak, Boyd Haley, Carolyn Gallagher, Melody Goodman, M.I. Kawashti, O.R. Amin, N.G. Rowehy, T. Minami, Laura Hewitson, Brian Lopresti, Carol Stott, Scott Mason, Jaime Tomko, Bernard Rimland, Woody McGinnis, K. Shandley and D.W. Austin.
They are just a few of the many scientists whose peer-reviewed, published works have found possible links between vaccines and autism. But unlike The Lewin Group’s study, their research has not been endorsed and promoted by the government and, therefore, has not been widely reported in the media. In fact, news reports, blogs and “medical experts” routinely claim no such studies exist.
To be clear: no study to date conclusively proves or disproves a causal link between vaccines and autism and—despite the misreporting—none has claimed to do so. Each typically finds either (a) no association or (b) a possible association on a narrow vaccine-autism question. Taken as a whole, the research on both sides serves as a body of evidence.
The Astroturf Propaganda Campaign
It’s theoretically possible that all of the studies supporting a possible link between vaccines and autism are wrong. And, if the propagandists are to be believed, each of the researchers is an incompetent crank, quack, nut or fraud (and, of course, “anti-vaccine” for daring to dabble in research that attempts to solve the autism puzzle and leads to vaccine safety issues). The scientists and their research are “controversial,” simply because the propagandists declare them to be.
The disparaged scientists include well-published neurologists, pharmacists, epidemiologists, immunologists, PhD’s, chemists and microbiologists from places like Boston Children’s Hospital, Horizon Molecular Medicine at Georgia State University, University of British Columbia, City College of New York, Columbia University, Stony Brook University Medical Center, University of Northern Iowa, University of Michigan, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Arkansas Children’s Hospital Research Institute, Al Azhar University of Cairo, Kinki University in Japan, the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Swinburne University of Technology in Australia, Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology in Poland, Department of Child Health Care, Children’s Hospital of Fudan University in China, Utah State University and many more.
Their work is, at best, ignored by the media; at worst, viciously attacked by the predictable flock of self-appointed expert “science” bloggers who often title their blogs with the word “science” or “skeptics” to confer an air of legitimacy.
This astroturf movement, in my opinion, includes but is not limited to: LeftBrainRightBrain, ScienceBlogs, NeuroSkeptic, ScienceBasedMedicine, LizDitz, ScienceBasedMedicine, CrooksandLiars, RespectfulInsolence, HealthNewsReview, SkepticalRaptor, Skepticblog, Skeptics.com, Wired, BrianDeer, SethMnookin, Orac, Every Child by Two, the vaccine industry supported American Academy of Pediatrics, and the government/corporate funded American Council on Science and Health (once called “Voodoo Science, Twisted Consumerism” by the watchdog Center for Science in the Public Interest).
This circle operates with the moral support of the vaccine industry and its government partners, citing one another’s flawed critiques as supposed proof that each study has been “debunked,” though the studies continue to appear in peer-reviewed, published journals and in the government’s own National Institutes of Health library.
“Weak,” “too small,” “haphazard,” “not replicated,” “junk science,” “flawed,” “unrelated,” declare the propagandists, without exception. Just as attackers spent years challenging any study that linked tobacco to lung cancer.
They know that reporters who don’t do their homework will conduct an Internet search, run across the blogs with science-y sounding names, and uncritically accept their word as if it’s fact and prevailing thought.
These dogmatic "authority" believers (i.e. mind-controlled order followers) would seemingly never, ever, accept any contrary evidence or ideas or information that does not come from perceived authority figures — which is precisely how "authoritative" rulers become "authoritarian" rulers without the authority believers ever noticing.
Indeed, in learning the full extent of the number of children who are maimed and murdered by the vaccine industry, I have begun calling this devastating phenomenon a "medical holocaust." Those who deny it is taking place are, naturally, "medical holocaust deniers."
The mainstream media is full of medical holocaust deniers. They pretend to be journalists but are actually anti-science dogmatists who worship at the altar of the Church of Scientific Mysticism, from which all vaccine safety "proof" magically emerges following the ritualistic sacrifice of children. When an entire branch of medicine becomes so steeped in coercion, intimidation, censorship, the routine harming of children and the refusal to engage in any discussion about risks versus benefits, it is no longer science or medicine at all. It is a totalitarian medical regime that poses a real and present danger to the safety of children everywhere.
And thus to humanity itself.